Skip to content
AI Visibility Tracker

Track whether AI recommends your brand — across every engine.

An AI visibility tracker measures whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude mention, cite and recommend your brand when buyers ask AI about your category — and how your share of voice compares to the competitors named instead. SourceWatch runs your prompts across all four engines on a schedule, then does the one thing prompt-scraping tools can't: it cross-references the answers with the real AI-crawler and AI-referral traffic hitting your own site, so you see citations *and* the clicks they actually send. This is the AI-era replacement for a rank tracker.

TL;DR

  • **An AI visibility tracker** shows whether AI engines name and recommend your brand — measured by **mention rate**, **citations**, **sentiment**, and **share of voice** vs competitors.
  • **SourceWatch tracks four engines:** ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude (Claude is a premium add-on, not bundled on every plan).
  • **Moat 1 — first-party traffic, verified.** Most tools only guess by prompting LLMs. SourceWatch also captures the real AI crawlers and AI-referral clicks on your site, verified against vendor IP ranges — not inferred.
  • **Moat 2 — works inside Claude Code.** SourceWatch ships an MCP server, so your assistant can read the data and act on it. Almost no AI SEO tool does this.
  • **Honest about scope:** SourceWatch measures and guides — it does not write content for you, has no public REST API yet (MCP today), and the free audit covers one page (full-site is on trial).
  • **Pricing:** 14-day free trial, card optional. Starter / Growth / Agency / Enterprise, **unlimited seats** on every plan.

What an AI visibility tracker actually does

Search is no longer ten blue links. When someone asks an AI engine "what's the best option for X," it reads a blend of sources and writes one answer that names a few brands — then moves on. Being on that short list is the new page one. An AI visibility tracker is how you find out whether you're on it, for the questions your buyers actually ask.

Concretely, SourceWatch measures four signals you can act on:

  • **Mention rate** — how often you're named at all across a fixed set of prompts.
  • **Citations** — whether the answer links to your owned content, or just describes you without crediting you. A citation is stronger than a bare mention: it sends real traffic and signals the engine trusts your page.
  • **Sentiment** — whether the mention reads positive, neutral or critical. Being named as "the cheap one" is not the same as "the best for teams."
  • **Share of voice** — your slice of all brand mentions vs the competitors named instead. This is the number that tells you whether you're winning or losing the category.

Tracker vs checker vs platform

A free AI search visibility checker gives you a one-time snapshot. A *tracker* runs on a schedule and shows the trend, because AI answers drift — ask the same question twice and the wording changes, so a single reading is noise. The broader AI visibility platform wraps tracking, traffic capture and competitor analysis into one place.

Why this matters now: clicks are moving into the answer

This isn't a hypothetical shift — it's measured. When Google shows an AI summary, users click a traditional link only about 8% of the time, versus 15% when no summary appears — nearly half. Clicks *inside* the AI summary happen just 1% of the time. Roughly one in five Google searches already produced an AI summary, and 58% of users hit at least one.

8% vs 15%

Google link-click rate with an AI summary vs without; clicks inside the summary happen ~1% of the time (Pew Research, 2025)

And the traffic that does flow from AI is real, growing, and worth winning. AI referral traffic to websites grew roughly 7x between early 2024 and mid-2025. ChatGPT alone drives about 87% of AI referral traffic across key industries — and that traffic converts at ~7.1%, second only to paid search. Being cited isn't a vanity metric; it's a high-intent acquisition channel that didn't exist three years ago.

Why track all four engines, not just ChatGPT

The share of generative-AI traffic is shifting fast: ChatGPT has been falling as a share of gen-AI web traffic while Gemini and Claude climb (Similarweb). A ChatGPT-only tool measures a shrinking slice. SourceWatch tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude so your visibility data follows the buyers, not yesterday's leader.

The two things prompt-scraping tools can't do

Almost every AI visibility tool works the same way: it fires synthetic prompts at the LLMs and scrapes the answers. That's useful, and SourceWatch does it too. But it's an *inference* — a sample of what the model might say, not a record of what actually happened on your site. SourceWatch adds two things that require being on your own analytics, which a prompt-scraper structurally cannot reach.

Moat 1 — First-party AI traffic, verified, not inferred

When an AI engine reads or cites your site, its crawler hits your pages and its answers send real referral clicks. SourceWatch captures both from your own first-party data via a one-line snippet or a Cloudflare Worker — and verifies each hit against published vendor IP ranges, so a spoofed user-agent pretending to be GPTBot doesn't pollute your numbers. That's ground truth: the real bots that crawled you and the real visitors who arrived from AI, separated from the fakes. Prompt-scraping tools can't show this because it doesn't live in the model — it lives in your logs.

Why "verified vs inferred" is the whole game on accuracy

Synthetic sampling can be badly wrong. One review caught a prompt-sampling tool undercounting a brand's ChatGPT mentions by roughly 97%. First-party capture isn't a sample — it's the actual event, so it doesn't drift with prompt selection or model mood.

Moat 2 — It works inside Claude Code (MCP-native)

SourceWatch ships an MCP server, so your AI visibility data is readable and actionable from inside Claude Code — your assistant can pull your citation gaps and the real queries the models ran, and help you act on them in the same loop, not just stare at a dashboard. Among self-serve tools this is effectively unique; the only comparable agent stack is enterprise-only and gated behind a separate subscription.

What SourceWatch does NOT do (so you can choose with eyes open)

It does not generate content for you — it tells you exactly what to write and where the gaps are, but you (or your team, or your assistant) write it. There is no public REST API yet; access today is via MCP, with a REST surface on the roadmap. The free audit covers a single page; full-site auditing is on the trial. And no honest tool can promise a Google Knowledge Panel or guaranteed ROI — anyone who does is selling you a coin flip.

How SourceWatch tracks your AI visibility

Connect once and the loop runs itself — no tags to babysit, no spreadsheets, no per-page code.

  1. 1

    Define your prompts

    List the questions your buyers actually ask AI — discovery ("best X for Y"), comparison ("X vs Z"), and use-case ("how do I…"). SourceWatch can suggest a starter set from your site.

  2. 2

    Run them across the engines, on a schedule

    The same prompts fire at ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude weekly by default (daily is an upsell), so readings are comparable over time instead of one-off snapshots.

  3. 3

    Measure mentions, citations & share of voice

    For every run SourceWatch scores your mention rate, who got cited, sentiment, and your share of voice against a fixed competitor roster — the trend line, not just today's number.

  4. 4

    Cross-reference with real AI traffic

    It ties the answers to the verified AI crawlers and AI-referral clicks hitting your site, so you see not just "am I cited?" but "is it sending traffic?" — and you can act on it in Claude Code via MCP.

See where you stand right now. Run a free AI SEO audit — it checks whether AI engines can read and recognize one page of your site in about 15 seconds, no card required.

Run a free AI SEO audit

Who it's for

SourceWatch scales from a single brand to a full agency. The buyer is usually plain-spoken — searching "how do I show up in AI search" or "how to track AI mentions," not "generative engine optimization."

  • **Solo brands & in-house marketers** — one site, the core engines, your first result in about 15 minutes. Start on Starter.
  • **Growing brands** — more prompts, more sites, and Gemini added as you expand coverage. Start on Growth.
  • **Agencies & multi-brand teams** — pooled prompts across up to 10 sites with white-label reports clients can open under your brand. Start on Agency.
  • **Enterprise** — all engines, negotiated volume, and a committed plan.

Pricing, in one glance

Flat plans priced on value, with cost caps that keep them honest — generous on weekly tracking (cheap) and tight on the expensive levers (daily runs and Claude). Positioned at the top of medium: far below the enterprise leaders, above the budget scrapers. Every plan includes unlimited seats and a 14-day free trial, card optional.

PlanPriceEnginesSitesWeekly promptsBest for
Starter$99/moChatGPT + Perplexity120Solo brands & in-house
Growth$349/mo+ Gemini375Growing brands
Agency$699/mo3 engines, pooled10200Agencies, white-label
Enterprisefrom $1,500/moAll enginesCustomNegotiatedLarge teams

**Add-ons** layer on without changing the base plan: Claude premium prompts ($80/site/mo), an extra Gemini engine on Starter (+$39/mo), and extra sites (+$39–49/mo each). Claude is held out of base tiers on purpose — it costs far more per check than the other engines, so bundling it everywhere would quietly wreck the economics. See full pricing for the detail.

Where SourceWatch sits vs the category

The market runs from budget scrapers (~$29/mo) to enterprise platforms ($2,000/mo and up, often sales-gated annual contracts). SourceWatch lands in the self-serve sweet spot with two things the cheap tools lack — verified first-party traffic and MCP — and without the price tag, sales process, and platform bloat of the enterprise tier.

Explore the toolkit

This page is the hub. Each job below has a page of its own:

Comparing options? See the best AI SEO tools roundup, or the head-to-heads with Semrush, Profound and Conductor.

Ready to see whether AI recommends you? Start a 14-day free trial — card optional, unlimited seats, and your first reading in about 15 minutes.

Start your free trial

Frequently asked questions

What is an AI visibility tracker?

An AI visibility tracker measures whether AI answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite and recommend your brand when people ask about your category. It tracks your mention rate, citations, sentiment, and share of voice against competitors — on a schedule, because AI answers drift over time. It's the AI-era replacement for a Google rank tracker. SourceWatch adds a second layer most trackers skip: it also captures the real AI-crawler and AI-referral traffic hitting your own site.

How is this different from a normal SEO rank tracker?

A rank tracker watches where you sit in Google's blue links. An AI visibility tracker watches the AI answers that increasingly replace them — whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude name you, your share of voice against competitors, and the real AI traffic hitting your site. The two don't reliably correlate: a #1 Google ranking does not guarantee an AI mention, so AI visibility has to be measured on its own.

Which AI engines does SourceWatch track?

Four: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Claude is a bounded premium add-on rather than a base-tier inclusion, because it costs significantly more per check than the other engines. On the traffic side, SourceWatch also classifies and verifies AI crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended against published IP ranges.

How is SourceWatch more accurate than tools that just prompt the LLMs?

Prompt-scraping tools infer your visibility from a sample of synthetic prompts — useful, but a guess that drifts with which prompts you pick. SourceWatch does that too, then cross-references it with first-party data: the real AI crawlers that hit your pages and the real referral clicks that arrived from AI, verified against vendor IP ranges so spoofed bots don't count. That's ground truth, not a sample. One review found a prompt-sampling tool undercounting ChatGPT mentions by roughly 97% — exactly the gap first-party capture closes.

Source: Pew Research — AI summaries reduce clicks
Does SourceWatch write content or fix my pages for me?

No — and we're upfront about it. SourceWatch shows you exactly which prompts you're missing, which competitors are named instead, and which pages to improve, but it does not generate content for you. Because it's MCP-native, you can pull that guidance into Claude Code and have your assistant draft against it in the same loop. The full-site audit is on the trial; the public page audit is one page free.

Is there an API?

Today, access is via an MCP server, which works natively inside Claude Code and other MCP clients. A public REST API with webhooks is on the roadmap, not shipped yet — so if a documented REST endpoint is a hard requirement right now, that's a fair reason to wait or talk to us about timing.

Source: Model Context Protocol — official docs
How much does it cost?

Plans start at $99/mo (Starter: ChatGPT + Perplexity, 1 site, 20 weekly prompts), $349/mo (Growth: adds Gemini, 3 sites, 75 prompts), and $699/mo (Agency: 3 engines pooled, 10 sites, 200 prompts, white-label). Enterprise starts from $1,500/mo. Every plan includes unlimited seats and a 14-day free trial with card optional. Claude is an $80/site/mo add-on.

How fast can I see results?

Your first AI visibility reading typically lands within about 15 minutes of connecting a site. Because AI answers are non-deterministic, the meaningful signal is the trend across scheduled runs — so the longer you track, the clearer the picture of whether your visibility is climbing or sliding.

Source: Digiday — The state of AI referral traffic in 2025

Further reading

In this guide

See whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini & Claude cite your brand — and your share of voice vs competitors. 14-day free trial, card optional.

Connect your first site and watch SourceWatch score your AI visibility in minutes.